Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600503›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life.

Laila de Vries, Maya Kylén, Tony Svensson, Jodi Sturge, Ruby Lipson-Smith, Steven M Schmidt, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Marie Elf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laila de VriesSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0001-2441-107X
Maya KylénSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-3674
Tony SvenssonSchool of Information and Engineering, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Jodi SturgeDepartment of Design, Production and Management, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Ruby Lipson-SmithThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Westmead, Australia.
Steven M SchmidtDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hélène Pessah-RasmussenDepartment of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory Disorders and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Marie ElfSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.

Funding

This study was supported by a FORMAS grant number 2021-01455.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition to undertaking rehabilitation in the home or local neighbourhood calls for an extensive understanding of which aspects of the built environment are important for people with stroke.

objectiveThis qualitative study aims to explore how home and local neighbourhood environments support or hinder rehabilitation for people who have had a stroke from the perspectives of various stakeholders.

methodsThrough a purposive selection method, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 stakeholders: people with stroke (n = 3), significant others (n = 3), healthcare professionals (n = 4), care managers (n = 3) and architects (n = 3). Content analysis was used to identify patterns and create themes.

findingsSixteen stakeholders, including 12 women and 4 men aged 30-74, participated in this study. Our findings identify areas linked to the WHO age-friendly environment framework, which addresses environmental limitations relevant to stroke rehabilitation. The categories used and factors identified: (1) Outdoor environments: accessibility, safety and supportiveness. (2) Transport and mobility: accessible and reach central services. (3) Housing: adaptations, layout and accessibility. (4) Social participation: spaces that are varied and flexible. (5) Social inclusion and non-discrimination: shared decision-making. (6) Civic engagement and employment: supporting environments. (7) Communication and information: digital accessibility. (8) Community and health services: patient-centred approach and access to varied rehabilitation.

conclusionThis study brings together multiple perspectives from key stakeholders with experience within stroke care. By integrating insights, these findings highlight how built environmental factors in the home and local neighbourhood can support the transition to home-based rehabilitation, which can improve recovery and return to everyday life. In turn, this study contributes to the innovative development of home and neighbourhood environments to influence and support stroke rehabilitation. Linking the findings to the WHO framework increases our understanding of a supportive environment for people with stroke, but also for people with other long-term conditions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This qualitative study is part of a comprehensive research project '(Built Environments to support rehabilitation for people with stroke, B-SURE)', which aims to investigate how factors in the built environment influence stroke rehabilitation and to develop built environment solutions. B-SURE has a participatory methodology that essentially includes and involves the stakeholders in the multiple stages of the study and ensures an iterative and collaborative process.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentStakeholder ParticipationStroke RehabilitationAdultAgedEnvironment DesignFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeighborhood CharacteristicsQualitative ResearchSocial Participationbuilt environmenthome rehabilitationlife after strokeperson‐centredqualitative methodrehabilitation processstroke recovery

Identifiers

PMID40600503
PMCPMC12215816

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.