ReviewJournal of neurology2025
Therapeutic strategies targeting complement in myasthenia gravis patients.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- The Role of Complement Anaphylatoxins (C3a and C5a) in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by impaired neuromuscular junction transmission, leading to fluctuating muscle weakness. With the progressive identification of MG-related antibodies, such as acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies, coupled with advancements in antibody detection technology, the use of these diagnostic markers has become widely accessible in clinical practice. This has facilitated the detection of key biomarkers and enabled the study of targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at addressing the underlying production of MG pathogenic antibodies and their various stages of pathogenicity. Among the emerging therapeutic strategies, complement-targeting drugs have garnered significant attention from medical researchers because of their ability to reduce complement activation and inhibit autoimmune-mediated tissue damage. Inhibition of the terminal complement cascade has demonstrated efficacy in reducing disease severity and improving clinical outcomes, particularly in refractory cases of MG. This review summarizes the underlying mechanisms of complement activation in MG, evaluates the current therapeutic landscape, including both approved and investigational complement inhibitors and discusses the safety considerations of their application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.