ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Real-world data and Mendelian randomization analysis in assessing adverse reactions of rilonacept.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disproportionality Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with IL-1 Inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRilonacept, an interleukin-1 (IL-1) "trap," is FDA-approved for recurrent pericarditis, but research on its adverse reactions is limited due to its recent introduction.
aimThis study aimed to identify potential adverse reactions associated with rilonacept using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and to evaluate long-term effects through Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
methodWe analyzed all adverse event reports related to rilonacept from the FAERS database between January 2021 and June 2024. Positive signals for adverse reactions were extracted using reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information components (IC). MR analysis was conducted using genetic variants as instrumental variables to explore causal relationships between rilonacept and identified adverse reactions, with sensitivity analyses performed for robustness.
resultsA total of 419 adverse event reports were analyzed, documenting 1847 AEs. Common events included COVID-19, injection site rash, pain, and injection site reaction, categorized into 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Notable frequencies were found in Infections and Infestations, Nervous System Disorders, and Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders. Disproportionality analysis identified positive signals primarily in Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders, Cardiac Disorders, and Immune System Disorders, with 11 AEs showing positive signals in both Preferred Terms (PTs) and SOCs. MR analysis revealed significant associations between IL-1RN (rilonacept) and allergic urticaria (OR: 1.56), rash (OR: 0.64), and myocarditis (OR: 2.26).
conclusionRilonacept is effective for certain inflammatory conditions, but careful monitoring for adverse reactions, particularly involving the immune system, skin, and cardiac issues, is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40601088What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.