ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Wealth-based inequalities in early childhood development (ECD) outcomes in Bangladesh: A decomposition analysis using MICS 2019.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Composite index for measuring socioeconomic and regional inequalities in early childhood development in Bangladesh.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early Childhood Development (ECD) inequality among different socioeconomic groups is a rising concern in developing countries. This paper aimed to identify and decompose the ECD inequality among poor and non-poor groups in Bangladesh. For measuring inequality in ECD, concentration curves and their corresponding indices were used in this study utilizing the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019 data. Furthermore, a standard decomposition approach has been used to decompose the inequality. Findings reveal that children from poor families consistently exhibit lower scores across all ECD domains. Notably, a significant disparity exists in the literacy-numeracy domain, with a concentration index of 0.1825. A lower proportion of poor children (34.17%) meet developmental milestones compared to their well-off counterparts (65.83%). Key determinants influencing ECD outcomes among the poor group include attendance at early childhood education (ECE) programs, sex of the child, multiple childcare involvement of mother, and supervision quality. Additionally, wealth-based disparities in ECD outcomes can be attributed to factors such as maternal education, access to books, nutrition, and the quality of childcare provided. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions and policy reforms aimed at addressing the specific needs of disadvantaged children, especially for literacy and numeracy skills. By prioritizing poverty reduction initiatives, access to quality Early Childhood Education (ECE) programs, provision of books, improving maternal education, and enhancing supervision quality, efforts can be made to narrow the wealth-based gap in ECD.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.