ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2025
Associations Between Immigrant Status and Dietary Patterns in ENCLAVE, A Pooled, Observational Study of Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer.
Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiet, critical to breast cancer (BC) survivorship, may change with immigration.
objectiveWe examined associations between immigration factors and diet in a large, diverse population of BC survivors.
methodsThe Exploring Networks in a Cohort of Latina and Asian Emigrants, lifestyle, and Vital status (ENCLAVE) study included harmonized, pooled data from 4882 Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women from 3 Northern California cohorts of women diagnosed from 1996 to 2013 with invasive BC and who provided data on immigrant status and diet. We conducted principal components analysis of data from food frequency questionnaires, which produced "prudent" and "Western" dietary patterns. Outcomes were tertiles characterizing the most healthful (i.e., highest prudent, lowest Western) patterns. Secondary outcomes included high intakes of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and soy and low intakes of red meat, high-fat dairy, and sweets. We fit log-binomial regression models to examine self-reported nativity and immigration-related variables (language preference, age at immigration, years in the United States, and second-generation status) and relative prevalence of dietary outcomes, overall and by race and ethnicity.
resultsThe correlation between the prudent and Western patterns was r = -0.08, P < 0.001. Foreign-born women consumed higher prudent (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.38, 1.67) and lower Western (PR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.37, 1.67) diets, as well as higher F&V, and lower butter and red meat intake, compared with United States-born women. Associations were similar by race and ethnicity, although we noted dietary heterogeneity for certain foods and by other immigration-related variables.
conclusionsForeign-born Asian, Hispanic, and NHW women with BC have healthier dietary patterns than United States-born women, overall and within same-race groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.