ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2025
Enhancing gene expression studies in bovine embryos fertilized in vitro: Identifying stable reference genes across blastocysts with different developmental speeds.
Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Developmental Competence Predicts Pregnancy Outcomes Following Transfer of Beef Embryos to Dairy Recipients: A Retrospective Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Role of Glutathione in Alleviating Chilling Injury in Bovine Blastocysts: Mitochondrial Restoration and Apoptosis Inhibition.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial for livestock reproduction; however, pregnancy rates after embryo transfer vary depending on the developmental speeds of the embryos. Although quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used to predict developmental potential, its reliability depends on the selection of appropriate reference genes (RGs) for normalization. To determine suitable RGs in bovine blastocysts with different developing speed, we evaluated the stability of eight candidate RGs (18S, ACTB, GAPDH, HMBS, PPIA, TBP, HPRT1, and SDHA) in early-, mid-, and late-developing IVF blastocysts (E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL, respectively) using RefFinder. Despite morphological similarities, E-BL, M-BL, and L-BL exhibited different biological features, including significantly lower pregnancy rates in L-BL than in the other groups, and less abundant transcript levels of five candidate RGs in L-BL than in E-BL. RefFinder revealed that ACTB was the most stable RG, whereas TBP was the least stable. To emphasize the critical importance of selecting stable RGs, we analyzed the expression of key developmental markers including those of the inner cell mass (ICM; OCT4, SOX2) and trophectoderm (TE; CDX2, GATA3, IFNτ), using various RGs for normalization. For ICM markers, normalization with ACTB showed results consistent with pregnancy rates, whereas moderately stable (18S) and less stable (TBP) RGs yielded contradictory outcomes. Normalization with unstable RGs produced inconsistent TE marker expression patterns (CDX2, GATA3) and overestimated (IFNτ) results across groups, compared with the results of ACTB. These results demonstrate that selecting inappropriate RGs for qPCR normalization can lead to misinterpretation, highlighting the necessity of proper RG evaluation to ensure accurate results in bovine embryo research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.