ArticleScientific reports2025
Influence of cognitive networks and task performance on fMRI-based state classification using DNN models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive biotypes identified through ECG-derived workload and behavioral accuracy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- EEG microstate alterations in Parkinson's disease dementia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reconstructing brain causal dynamics for subject and task fingerprints using fMRI time-series data.Health information science and systems · 2025Article
- Decoding decision-making behavior from sparse neural spiking activity.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel at extracting insights from complex data across various fields, however, their application in cognitive neuroscience remains limited, largely due to the lack of approaches with interpretability. Here, we employ two different and complementary DNN models, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM), to classify cognitive task states from fMRI data, focusing on the cognitive underpinnings of the classification. The 1D-CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 81% (Macro AUC = 0.96), while the BiLSTM reached 78% (Macro AUC = 0.95). Despite the architectural differences, both models demonstrated a robust relationship between prediction accuracy and individual cognitive performance (p < 0.05 for 1D-CNN, and p < 0.001 for BiLSTM), with lower classification accuracy observed in individuals with poorer task performance. Feature importance analysis highlighted the dominance of visual networks, suggesting that task-driven state differences are primarily encoded in visual processing. Attention and control networks also showed relatively high importance. We observed individual trait-based effects and subtle model-specific differences: 1D-CNN yielded slightly better overall performance, while BiLSTM showed better sensitivity for individual behavior. This study highlights the application of interpretable DNNs in revealing cognitive mechanisms associated with task performance and individual variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.