ArticleScientific reports2025
Variabilities in the stroking parameters during short course 50 m time trials in all four competitive swimming strokes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify intra- and inter-individual variabilities during short course 50 m sprints. Swimming velocity (SV), stroke frequency (SF), and stroke length (SL) for each stroke cycle in 189 male and 160 female swimmers' 50 m time trials (with their specialised stroke) were analysed. The inter-individual variability for each kinematic variable was analysed using the inter-individual standard deviation of the Gaussian Process regression. Intra-participant variability was analysed using k-means clustering with kinematic data extracted from the first, mid-, and last strokes. In all strokes and both sexes, swimmers showed large inter-individual kinematic variabilities at the first and last strokes, which justified the need to separate these strokes from the clean-swimming segment in race analyses. Intra-individual kinematic patterns were categorised into four clusters with different within-lap SV patterns. Particularly, many front crawl and backstroke swimmers showed a faster velocity in mid-pool than in the transition, while many butterfly swimmers showed the fastest SV in the transition. This might suggest a greater difficulty in the transition technique in alternating strokes than in butterfly. Race analyses should focus on not only the overall trend but also individual variabilities to investigate the swimmers' behaviour during swimming races.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.