Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603612›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2025

Endoscopic management of gastric stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Marina Eguchi, Raquel Nogueira, Carlos A Balthazar da Silveira, Laura Vidotto, João Pedro Gonçalves Kasakewitch, Gabriele Eckerdt Lech, Victor Perim, Diego L Lima, Diego Camacho

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marina EguchiDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, 740 Botucatu St, São Paulo, SP, 04023-062, Brazil.
Raquel NogueiraDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Carlos A Balthazar da SilveiraDepartment of General Surgery, Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Laura VidottoUniversidade Anhembi Morumbi, 1601, Rio das Pedras Av, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
João Pedro Gonçalves KasakewitchHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Gabriele Eckerdt LechPontifical Catholic University of Rio grande do Sul, 6681, Ipiranga Av, Porto Alegre, RS, 90619-900, Brazil.
Victor PerimDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Diego L LimaDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. dilaurentino@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-1284
Diego CamachoDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSymptomatic gastric stenosis is a rare but challenging complication following sleeve gastrectomy, leading to malnutrition and a significant reduction in quality of life. With limited data on endoscopic treatments for this issue, this systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic interventions for managing gastric stenosis post-sleeve gastrectomy.

methodsPubMed, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting endoscopic management of symptomatic gastric stenosis following sleeve gastrectomy. Case reports or studies involving fewer than five patients, as well as those including patients with concomitant leaks, other types of bariatric procedures, or stenosis of non-gastric origin, were excluded. The outcomes assessed were the number of dilatations or procedures performed, length of hospital stay, clinical response to endoscopic management, use of stents, and the need for subsequent surgery to address symptoms after endoscopic treatment. The proportional meta-analysis was performed with R software.

resultsFrom 1496 initial results, twenty eight studies reporting endoscopic management of symptomatic gastric stenosis following sleeve gastrectomy were included. Our sample comprised 1068 patients. The predominant endoscopic treatments were balloon dilation and stent placement. Most patients experienced a positive endoscopic response (77.8 events per 100 observations; 95% CI 68-85; heterogeneity p-value < 0.01), with an average of 1.82 dilations or endoscopic procedures needed per patient to resolve symptoms (95% CI 1.6-1.9; heterogeneity p-value < 0.01). To achieve symptom resolution, some patients required stent placement (19.2 events per 100 observations; 95% CI 12.9-27.7; Heterogeneity p-value < 0.01). Only a small percentage of patients needed subsequent surgery following endoscopic management (15.9 events per 100 observations; 95% CI 10.6-23.3; Heterogeneity p-value < 0.01).

conclusionOur analysis suggests that endoscopic management of gastric stenosis following sleeve gastrectomy is efficient and safe. The average number of dilatations or procedures required to resolve symptoms is reasonable, as this approach avoids more invasive measures, and the proportion of patients who required subsequent surgical intervention was relatively small. "Level of Evidence: Level III, Systematic Review Study." STUDY REGISTRATION: A review protocol for this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO ID CRD42024594486, October 07, 2024.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrectomyGastroscopyPostoperative ComplicationsConstriction, PathologicHumansStentsEndoscopyGastric stenosisSleeve gastrectomySurgery

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.