SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2025
Endoscopic management of gastric stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early and Late Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Narrative Review.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2026Review
- Preoperative Triglyceride-Glucose Index as a Predictor of Weight Loss Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Early 60-Day Morbidity after Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Propensity-Matched Single-Center Cohort of 2,382 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Tunneled Stricturotomy for Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Stenosis: Case Series and Literature Review.DEN open · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Management of Post-Bariatric Surgery Complications: Diagnostic Work-Up and Innovative Approaches for Leak, Fistula, and Stricture Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSymptomatic gastric stenosis is a rare but challenging complication following sleeve gastrectomy, leading to malnutrition and a significant reduction in quality of life. With limited data on endoscopic treatments for this issue, this systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic interventions for managing gastric stenosis post-sleeve gastrectomy.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting endoscopic management of symptomatic gastric stenosis following sleeve gastrectomy. Case reports or studies involving fewer than five patients, as well as those including patients with concomitant leaks, other types of bariatric procedures, or stenosis of non-gastric origin, were excluded. The outcomes assessed were the number of dilatations or procedures performed, length of hospital stay, clinical response to endoscopic management, use of stents, and the need for subsequent surgery to address symptoms after endoscopic treatment. The proportional meta-analysis was performed with R software.
resultsFrom 1496 initial results, twenty eight studies reporting endoscopic management of symptomatic gastric stenosis following sleeve gastrectomy were included. Our sample comprised 1068 patients. The predominant endoscopic treatments were balloon dilation and stent placement. Most patients experienced a positive endoscopic response (77.8 events per 100 observations; 95% CI 68-85; heterogeneity p-value < 0.01), with an average of 1.82 dilations or endoscopic procedures needed per patient to resolve symptoms (95% CI 1.6-1.9; heterogeneity p-value < 0.01). To achieve symptom resolution, some patients required stent placement (19.2 events per 100 observations; 95% CI 12.9-27.7; Heterogeneity p-value < 0.01). Only a small percentage of patients needed subsequent surgery following endoscopic management (15.9 events per 100 observations; 95% CI 10.6-23.3; Heterogeneity p-value < 0.01).
conclusionOur analysis suggests that endoscopic management of gastric stenosis following sleeve gastrectomy is efficient and safe. The average number of dilatations or procedures required to resolve symptoms is reasonable, as this approach avoids more invasive measures, and the proportion of patients who required subsequent surgical intervention was relatively small. "Level of Evidence: Level III, Systematic Review Study." STUDY REGISTRATION: A review protocol for this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO ID CRD42024594486, October 07, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40603612What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.