Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603739›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025

L-arginine vs. L-glutamine oral suspensions for radiation-induced oral mucositis: a triple-blind randomized trial.

Fatma E A Hassanein, Christine Mikhail, Sarah Elkot, Asmaa Abou-Bakr

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06764420 (Effect of Arginine and Glutamine on Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06764420 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Arginine and Glutamine on Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis: a Trible Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsRadiation Mucositis, Head and Neck CancerArmsGlutamine Oral Suspension, Arginine and Glutamine Oral Suspension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatma E A HassaneinOral Medicine, Periodontology, and Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry, King Salman International University, El Tur, South Sinai, 11371, Egypt. fatma.hassanein@ksiu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8010-9265
Christine MikhailOral Medicine, Periodontology, and Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry, King Salman International University, El Tur, South Sinai, 11371, Egypt.
Sarah ElkotOral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Future University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Asmaa Abou-BakrOral Medicine, Periodontology, and Oral Diagnosis Faculty of Dentistry, Galala University, Suez, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) severely impacts patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiotherapy, often leading to pain and malnutrition. L-arginine and glutamine are immune-enhancing amino acids with potential benefits in wound healing and inflammation control. This study evaluated the efficacy of L-arginine versus L-glutamine oral suspensions in managing RIOM.

methodsIn this triple-blind, randomized controlled trial, 69 HNC patients with RIOM were allocated to three groups (n = 23 each): Group I (L-arginine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), Group II (glutamine 5 g + maltodextrin 5 g), or Group III (maltodextrin 10 g). Outcomes, assessed at weeks 2, 5, and 7 of radiotherapy, included the WHO oral mucositis scale, Pain Visual Analogue Scale (Pain-VAS), body mass index (BMI), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire.

resultsBy week 5, WHO scale scores differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), with arginine and glutamine groups exhibiting lower mucositis severity than the maltodextrin group. Pain-VAS scores at weeks 5 and 7 were significantly lower in the arginine and glutamine groups compared to maltodextrin (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). By 7th week of radiotherapy, BMI was significantly decreased in the maltodextrin group than in either the arginine (p = 0.028) or glutamine (p = 0.001) groups, indicative of treatment-mediated weight loss. In contrast, the BMI over time in the arginine (p = 0.87) and glutamine (p = 0.170) groups were almost constant. This indicates that compared to maltodextrin alone, both amino acid supplements prevented a decline in BMI during radiotherapy. OHIP-14 scores improved significantly in the arginine and glutamine groups at weeks 5 and 7 (p < 0.001), indicating better quality of life.

conclusionsBoth L-arginine and glutamine significantly reduced RIOM severity, pain, and weight loss compared to maltodextrin, while improving quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Although no statistically significant difference was found between the two, a higher proportion of patients receiving L-arginine achieved complete healing by week 7, suggesting a potential late advantage. These findings support the use of both amino acids as viable options for symptom management during radiotherapy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06764420), registered 08/01/2024.

Indexed as

ArginineGlutamineHead and Neck NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesStomatitisAdministration, OralAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysaccharidesSuspensionsArginineGlutaminemaltodextrinPolysaccharidesSuspensionsHead and neck cancerL-arginineL-glutamineOral mucositisRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40603739
PMCPMC12222376

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.