ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterizing everyday exposure to volatile organic compounds and upper respiratory health effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between volatile organic compound mixtures and allostatic load: Evidence from the Green Heart Louisville Project.Environmental research · 2026Article
- A Population-Centered Health Framework for Analyzing Superfund Sites With a History of Volatile Organic Compound Contamination.Community health equity research & policy · 2026Article
- A TRPA1-mediated substance P release assay as anFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are relatively understudied pollutants compared to particulate matter but are ubiquitous in outdoor and indoor environments. Prior studies on VOCs on sinonasal health have been difficult to generalize due to limitations in their definitions of VOC exposures. We took a novel, holistic approach to characterize a major fraction of daily VOC exposure and its link to sinonasal health. Our study included 981 participants (mean ages = 58.8 years, ranges = 40-80 years) from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with available urinary VOC metabolites (mVOC) data. We used two unsupervised techniques to address the association between VOC exposure and sinonasal health outcomes. First, we applied factor analysis to identify the sources of urinary mVOCs. Logistic regression was employed to analyze associations between each source and sinonasal health questionnaires. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) was used to identify and compare the exposure patterns in subgroups. Factor analysis found three likely sources of exposure: "household goods", "occupation contaminants", and "fuel emissions". Logistic regression showed that exposure to "household goods" was associated with a 22.2% higher likelihood of multiple sinus infections (p = 0.003), while "fuel emissions" were linked to a 16.4% increase (p = 0.026). UMAP identified subgroups where individuals with lower socioeconomic status, coupled with specific behavioral and lifestyle habits, may face an increased risk of VOC exposure and negative sinonasal health outcomes. Our findings provide evidence that usage of certain everyday goods, exposure to fuel emissions, and the characteristics of one's home and built environment could play a prominent role in an individual's overall VOC exposure and the manifestation of upper respiratory disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.