Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring the drivers of inter- and intraspecific differences in prosociality in four parrot species.

Désirée Brucks, Nick C P Dam, Anastasia Krasheninnikova, Bethan McGregor, Hari Tsivlin, Auguste M P von Bayern, Jorg J M Massen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Désirée Brucks *Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Eberhard-Gwinner-Straße, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany. desiree.brucks@me.com.
Nick C P Dam *Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anastasia KrasheninnikovaMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Eberhard-Gwinner-Straße, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany.
Bethan McGregorLoro Parque Fundación, Max-Planck Comparative Cognition Research Station, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain.
Hari TsivlinLoro Parque Fundación, Max-Planck Comparative Cognition Research Station, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain.
Auguste M P von BayernMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Eberhard-Gwinner-Straße, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany. auguste.bayern@bi.mpg.de.
Jorg J M MassenAnimal Behavior & Cognition, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands. j.j.m.massen@uu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosocial behaviours - behaviours that benefit others at low or no cost to the actor - have been associated with cooperative breeding, nesting ecology, and overall levels of dependency and social tolerance. To confirm whether these factors drive the evolution of prosociality, we need to generate more robust data using a comparative approach with a standardised procedure. Parrots present a compelling model group to test this further due to their large brains, and advanced cognitive abilities. Using the group service paradigm, in which individuals can provide food to group memebers, we tested four distantly related parrot species with different socio-ecological backgrounds. All species provided food to group members at moderate to high levels and some individuals of all species were able to discriminate between situations in which food could be provided to others or not. All parrots demonstrated dyadic preferences by providing more food to both affiliated and non-related partners, with sex-specific effects varying between species. Furthermore, males from species that engage in cooperative breeding and territorial nesting provided the most food to members of their group. This implies that cooperative breeding and a reliance on other group members may be driving factors in the evolution of prosocial behaviour in parrots.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalParrotsSocial BehaviorAnimalsCooperative BehaviorFemaleMaleNesting BehaviorSpecies SpecificityAvian cognitionCooperationCooperative breeding hypothesisGroup service paradigmInterdependency hypothesisSelf-domestication hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID40603876
PMCPMC12222856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.