ArticleScientific reports2025
Deciphering the angiogenic potential of Zhishi Xiebai Guizhi decoction in coronary heart disease: an in-depth network pharmacology and experimental investigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ZXGD Decoction, a traditional Chinese formulation historically used for cardiovascular ailments, was evaluated for its efficacy in coronary heart disease (CHD) through an integrated network pharmacology and randomized controlled trial (RCT) approach. Its selection was rooted in documented therapeutic benefits for blood stasis and endothelial dysfunction, with modern pharmacology identifying active compounds (e.g., luteolin, quercetin) targeting inflammation and oxidative stress pathways. Network analysis revealed ZXGD’s multi-target mechanism, prominently modulating the PI3K-AKT and NF-κB pathways, supported by robust molecular docking scores (binding affinity < -7.0 kcal/mol). These findings align with CHD pathophysiology, suggesting ZXGD disrupts critical inflammatory cascades. In a double-blind RCT (n = 180), ZXGD adjunct therapy significantly improved angina frequency (35% reduction vs. control, p < 0.01) and endothelial function (FMD increase: 2.8% ± 0.5 vs. 1.2% ± 0.4, p < 0.05) over 12 weeks, with no severe adverse events. This underscores ZXGD’s clinical potential as a safe complementary treatment. Notably, lipid profile enhancements (LDL-C reduction: 18.3% vs. 11.7%) correlated with predicted network targets, including LDLR and HMGCR. Our results bridge traditional use with mechanistic evidence, reinforcing ZXGD’s role in CHD management. While prior studies emphasize ZXGD’s anti-thrombotic effects, this work uniquely validates its anti-inflammatory and lipid-modulating properties, addressing gaps in understanding its systemic impact. Clinically, these findings advocate for ZXGD’s integration into CHD therapeutic protocols, particularly for patients with residual inflammatory risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.