ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
Drivers of care and outcomes for people facing fetal conditions in the United States: a conceptual framework.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating fetal conditions through a Reproductive Justice lens: lessons from composite cases in the United States.Reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital anomalies, affecting 3-5% of pregnancies annually in the United States, are a leading cause of fetal and infant mortality. Despite advancements in fetal care, disparities in care access, quality, and outcomes persist and remain poorly understood. This perspective introduces the Fetal Condition Care and Outcomes (FCCO) Framework, a conceptual model that integrates contextual, individual, structural, and process-level factors influencing care and outcomes. We build on prior adaptations of Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Service Use and the Donabedian Structure, Process, and Outcomes Model, expanding their application from risk-appropriate neonatal care to individuals' whose pregnancies are complicated by severe fetal conditions. By synthesizing evidence across disciplines, we highlight critical gaps in understanding the drivers of disparities, including barriers to timely diagnosis, variations in counseling practices, and inequities in access to specialized services. This article calls for interdisciplinary research to ensure risk-appropriate, person-centered care for this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.