ArticleBMC primary care2025
Facilitators and barriers to deferring imaging for acute low back pain: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly imaging for uncomplicated acute low back pain has no diagnostic benefit yet is completed after nearly one-quarter of primary care visits for acute back pain. This qualitative study examined patient and clinician perspectives on facilitators and barriers to deferring imaging for acute low back pain, including potential messages regarding a watchful waiting strategy without early imaging.
methodsQualitative data derived from six patient focus groups (N = 30 patients with recent visits for acute low back pain) in Sacramento, CA and nine semi-structured physician interviews in 2020. Patients were asked about expectations regarding imaging, perceptions of care received for acute low back pain, and perspectives about potential messages encouraging a watchful waiting approach without early imaging. Clinicians were asked about facilitators and barriers to deferring low-value imaging. We used thematic analysis guided by grounded theory to identify and integrate themes.
resultsOver half of patients had received early imaging during their recent back pain episode. Patients expected physicians to provide a detailed rationale for ordering imaging or not. Patients were typically not persuaded by information on potential harms of imaging and sometimes thought discussion of imaging harms would undermine their trust in the clinician. Patients would be more willing to defer imaging if provided detailed and empathic guidance on pain management. Physicians expressed confidence in advocating a watchful waiting approach without imaging but acknowledged challenges in building patient trust during time-pressed visits, particularly when seeing patients for the first time.
conclusionsThis qualitative study highlights several challenges to deferring early imaging in acute low back pain, as patients typically expect early imaging and were skeptical of clinician messaging about imaging harms. Physicians highlighted lack of a previously established, trustful relationship as a common structural barrier to deferring low-value spinal imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.