ArticleBMC oral health2025
A dual approach to third molar complexity: correlating fractal analysis with the pederson difficulty index - non-clinical research article.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the Pederson Difficulty Index and fractal dimension analysis in impacted mandibular third molars, assessing whether fractal dimension analysis can serve as an adjunctive tool for predicting surgical difficulty.
methodsA total of 171 impacted mandibular third molars were retrospectively analyzed using digital panoramic radiographs. The Pederson Difficulty Index classified surgical difficulty based on angulation, impaction depth, and ramus relationship. Fractal dimension analysis was performed on three regions of interest: mesial, distal, and apical. Pearson correlation and one-way ANOVA assessed relationships between fractal dimension values and surgical difficulty categories.
resultsNo statistically significant correlation was found between fractal dimension values and gender across all regions of interest (p > 0.05). However, fractal dimension values demonstrated a non-significant increasing trend in distal and apical regions with increasing surgical difficulty, while mesial fractal dimension values decreased. These findings suggest potential trabecular bone adaptations related to third molar impaction, though further validation with three-dimensional imaging is required.
conclusionFD analysis offers a non-invasive and quantitative means of evaluating trabecular bone microarchitecture, which may assist clinicians in identifying areas of low or high bone resistance prior to surgical intervention. These insights can inform key surgical decisions such as flap design, osteotomy direction, and the selection of instruments (e.g., rotary tools vs. piezosurgery) to reduce trauma. Although FD should not replace established indices like the Pederson Index, it may complement them by adding microstructural depth to morphological assessments. Future integration with three-dimensional imaging and prospective clinical validation is essential to establish FD as a routine element in surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.