ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Four-year respiratory consequences of COVID-19 related pneumonia: a longitudinal cohort study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Organising Pneumonia Secondary to COVID-19: A 2-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Respiratory symptoms up to 18 months after COVID-19 - a longitudinal observational study.Respiratory research · 2026Observational
- Long-term chest CT abnormalities up to 4.5 years after COVID-19 hospitalization and their association with dyspnea and fatigue: a prospective cohort study.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Post-COVID Respiratory Sequelae in COPD: Mucus Plugging, Infectious Complications, and Risk-Stratified Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to describe respiratory sequelae up to 4 years after discharge in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia having required non-invasive respiratory support therapies.
methodsThis study was conducted between March 2020 and June 2020 at University Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta (Girona, Spain). We assessed the patient's dyspnoea and performed, pulmonary function tests, a high-resolution CT (HRCT), a 6-minute walking test, a blood test, and the Saint George's respiratory questionnaire 3 months after discharge. At the 6-month, 1-year, and 4-year follow-up, we repeated all tests except for pulmonary function, 6-min walking test, and HRCT, which were only performed if abnormal findings had been previously detected.
results94 patients were enrolled 3 months after discharge; 73% were male, the median age was 62.9 years, and most were non-smokers (58%). 56 patients (59.6%) completed the 4-year follow-up. When comparing data 3 months and 4 years after discharge, the percentage of patients presenting dyspnoea ≥ 2 decreased (19.5% vs. 7.9%), the quality-of-life total score improved (22.8% vs. 18.1%), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide improved (75.9% vs. 81.4%), the 6-min walking test distance was enhanced (368.0 m vs. 436.6 m), ground glass opacities findings waned (56.6% vs. 0.8%), and traction bronchiectasis increased (2.7% vs. 9.2%). Age was the only parameter that exhibited significant differences between patients with and without pulmonary fibrotic-like changes.
conclusionMost patients, 4 years after discharge, improved their pulmonary function, exercise capacity, clinical condition, and quality of life. Although pulmonary fibrotic-like changes were observed during the follow-ups, its disparity with clinical-functional improvement pointed to non-progressive and non-clinically relevant lung scars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.