ArticleBMC health services research2025
Recruiting patients into a healthcare services trial: lessons learned from a feasibility study to investigate a patient-oriented navigation intervention for age-associated diseases.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventions to improve care coordination, like patient navigation programs, aim to dismantle barriers faced by patients in accessing optimal care. A variety of interventions are currently being evaluated in Germany and internationally. A key challenge of these studies, as for trials in general, is finding an effective recruitment strategy to reach the intended sample size in the targeted population.
methodsDetailed documentation of the recruitment process was conducted as part of the process evaluation for a mixed-methods feasibility study including randomized trials and parallel cohort studies to evaluate a patient-oriented navigation program. Patients with lung cancer and stroke were actively recruited in inpatient and specialized outpatient settings in a rural and a metropolitan area in Germany between June 2021 and September 2022. Reasons for excluding or not approaching patients were documented and patients' reasons for refusal were assessed. All quantitative data were analysed in a descriptive manner. Experiences during the recruitment process were investigated through interviews with recruiting personnel and analysed through thematic analysis.
resultsThe data from the screening and recruitment process show that 74-76.5% of stroke patients and 91-93% of lung cancer patients were eligible to take part in the study. Of these, 44-46.9% of inpatients and 73% of outpatients were actively approached for recruitment. Reasons for not approaching patients were mainly due to organizational and contextual factors. Documented reasons for patients' refusal to participate in the study included feeling overwhelmed (stroke patients) and not perceiving the study as relevant (lung cancer patients).
conclusionsThe presented experiences and barriers during the recruitment process for a feasibility study of a patient navigation program provide important lessons for future planning of appropriate recruitment strategies to enrol patients with age-associated diseases.
trial registrationThe study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00025476, Registration Date: 04/06/2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.