Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604942›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Recruiting patients into a healthcare services trial: lessons learned from a feasibility study to investigate a patient-oriented navigation intervention for age-associated diseases.

Kathrin Gödde, Hella Fügemann, Ulrike Grittner, Raphael Kohl, Andreas Meisel, Thomas Reinhold, Nina Rieckmann, Susanne Schnitzer, P Markus Deckert, Nikolaj Frost and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kathrin GöddeInstitute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. kathrin.goedde@mhb-fontane.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-2032
Hella FügemannInstitute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike GrittnerInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Raphael KohlInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas MeiselCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas ReinholdInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nina RieckmannInstitute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne SchnitzerInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
P Markus DeckertDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Nikolaj FrostDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian H NolteCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan J SchreiberDepartment of Neurology, Oberhavel Kliniken, Clinic Hennigsdorf, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Ute Goerling *Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christine Holmberg *Institute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions to improve care coordination, like patient navigation programs, aim to dismantle barriers faced by patients in accessing optimal care. A variety of interventions are currently being evaluated in Germany and internationally. A key challenge of these studies, as for trials in general, is finding an effective recruitment strategy to reach the intended sample size in the targeted population.

methodsDetailed documentation of the recruitment process was conducted as part of the process evaluation for a mixed-methods feasibility study including randomized trials and parallel cohort studies to evaluate a patient-oriented navigation program. Patients with lung cancer and stroke were actively recruited in inpatient and specialized outpatient settings in a rural and a metropolitan area in Germany between June 2021 and September 2022. Reasons for excluding or not approaching patients were documented and patients' reasons for refusal were assessed. All quantitative data were analysed in a descriptive manner. Experiences during the recruitment process were investigated through interviews with recruiting personnel and analysed through thematic analysis.

resultsThe data from the screening and recruitment process show that 74-76.5% of stroke patients and 91-93% of lung cancer patients were eligible to take part in the study. Of these, 44-46.9% of inpatients and 73% of outpatients were actively approached for recruitment. Reasons for not approaching patients were mainly due to organizational and contextual factors. Documented reasons for patients' refusal to participate in the study included feeling overwhelmed (stroke patients) and not perceiving the study as relevant (lung cancer patients).

conclusionsThe presented experiences and barriers during the recruitment process for a feasibility study of a patient navigation program provide important lessons for future planning of appropriate recruitment strategies to enrol patients with age-associated diseases.

trial registrationThe study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00025476, Registration Date: 04/06/2021).

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPatient NavigationPatient SelectionStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedAge-associated diseasesNavigation interventionProcess evaluationStudy recruitment

Identifiers

PMID40604942
PMCPMC12224617

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.