Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604977›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Integrating an AI platform into clinical IT: BPMN processes for clinical AI model development.

Kfeel Arshad, Saman Ardalan, Björn Schreiweis, Björn Bergh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Smart assistive technologies for neurodisorders: A review on AI, IoT, and wearable systems for enhanced patient care.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kfeel ArshadInstitute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Saman ArdalanInstitute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Björn Schreiweis *Institute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. bjoern.schreiweis@uksh.de.
Björn Bergh *Institute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been a resurgence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on a global scale in recent times, resulting in the development of cutting-edge AI solutions within hospitals. However, this has also led to the creation of isolated AI solutions that are not integrated into clinical IT. To tackle this issue, a clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform that handles the entire development cycle of clinical AI models and is integrated into clinical IT is required. This research investigates the integration of a clinical AI platform into the clinical IT infrastructure. This is demonstrated by outlining the stages of the AI model development cycle within the clinical IT infrastructure, illustrating the interaction between different IT system landscapes within the hospital with BPMN diagrams.

methodsInitially, a thorough analysis of the requirements is conducted to refine the necessary aspects of the clinical AI platform with consideration of the individual aspects of clinical IT. Subsequently, processes representing the entire development cycle of an AI model are identified. To facilitate the architecture of the AI platform, BPMN diagrams of all the identified processes are created. Clinical use cases are used to evaluate the processes using the FEDS framework.

resultsOur BPMN process diagrams cover the entire development cycle of a clinical AI model within the clinical IT. The processes involved are Data Selection, Data Annotation, On-site Training and Testing, and Inference, with distinctions between (Semi-Automated) Batch Inference and Real-Time Inference. Three clinical use cases were assessed to evaluate the processes and demonstrate that this approach covers a wide range of clinical AI use cases.

conclusionsThe evaluations were executed successfully, which indicate the comprehensive nature of our approach. The results have shown that different clinical AI use cases are covered by the BPMN diagrams. Our clinical AI platform is ideally suited for the local development of AI models within clinical IT. This approach provides a basis for further developments, e.g., enabling the training and deployment of an AI model across multiple sites or the integration of security- and privacy-related aspects.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedical InformaticsSystems IntegrationHumansAI platformArtificial intelligenceBPMNClinical ITHealthcareMachine learningMedical data integration centerProcess diagrams

Identifiers

PMID40604977
PMCPMC12218938

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.