Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605013›Full record

ReviewClinical epigenetics2025

A review of the use of tumour DNA methylation for breast cancer subtyping and prediction of outcomes.

Elaheh Zarean, Shuai Li, Melissa C Southey, Pierre-Antoine Dugué

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elaheh ZareanPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Shuai LiPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Melissa C SoutheyPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Pierre-Antoine DuguéPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. pierre-antoine.dugue@monash.edu.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2017325National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2017373Victorian Cancer Agency MCRF22025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation in breast tumours has been extensively studied and has provided valuable insights into the clinical heterogeneity of breast cancer. In this review, we summarise the current literature that has used DNA methylation markers to subtype breast cancer and predict progression and survival. Widespread methylation differences have been observed across breast cancer subtypes at both the candidate genes and in genome-wide analyses, most notably between oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER-negative subtypes and for triple-negative tumours. Studies that attempted to create breast cancer subtypes using methylation data showed limited agreement in their capacity to group breast tumours, possibly due to methodological differences. Although many studies have reported associations of tumour DNA methylation with breast cancer outcomes and used machine learning methods to derive prediction models for survival, the extent to which these would replicate in independent datasets is currently unclear. We conclude that despite the potential of genome-wide methylation markers to unravel the heterogeneity of breast cancer, they currently appear to have limited clinical utility. Larger studies and replication of findings across studies are required to address the limitations of the existing literature.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMachine LearningPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerDNA methylationDNA methylation-based subtypesDNA methylation markersEpigenome-widePrediction modelsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID40605013
PMCPMC12220808

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.