Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606050›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of radiology2025

Review of imaging modalities and radiological findings of calvarial lesions.

Erkan Gökçe, Murat Beyhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The headband that held in the brain: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erkan GökçeDepartment of Radiology, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokat 60100, Türkiye. drerkangokce@gmail.com.
Murat BeyhanDepartment of Radiology, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokat 60100, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calvarial lesions are usually incidental and asymptomatic, rarely detected. However, these lesions can also present with pain, a palpable mass or a bone defect. Clinical information such as the patient's age and medical history are helpful in making the correct diagnosis. Calvarial lesions may occur due to congenital and anatomical variants, traumatic and iatrogenic, idiopathic, infectious and inflammatory, metabolic, benign and malignant neoplastic causes. Calvarial lesions may be solitary, multiple or diffuse, and may be lytic, sclerotic or mixed. Although most calvarial lesions are benign, radiologic imaging features can help to determine whether the lesion is benign or malignant. Methods that can guide treatment and are currently in use include plain radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, angiographic studies, and nuclear scintigraphy studies such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and whole-body bone scintigraphy. Defects, lysis and sclerosis in the bone structure are assessed by plain radiography and computed tomography, and the soft tissue components of the lesions and their relationship to the surrounding soft tissue are assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. This article reviews the imaging findings of benign and malignant calvarial lesions and normal variants that may be confused with systemic diseases and pathologies affecting the calvarium.

Indexed as

BenignCalvarial lesionsComputed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingMalignantSkull lesions

Identifiers

PMID40606050
PMCPMC12210201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.