ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2025
Comparative analysis of hyperuricemia induction methods and probiotic interventions in mice.
Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A metabolomic signatures in hyperuricemia: a systematic review.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Pooled it
- ABCG2 transporter: Structural and functional associations with gout (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Microglial Ccl4-Ccr5 signaling links systemic inflammation to synaptic loss and memory deficits in chronic kidney disease.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics are widely used as functional food additives, but more studies are needed for their use in mitigation of hyperuricemia (HUA). Currently, there are no standardized animal models for HUA. There is significant variability in the animal strains, drugs, dosages, and modeling periods used in published studies, which greatly impacts the comparability of experimental results and complicates the effectiveness evaluation of therapeutic agents. In this study, we systematically compared different methods for inducing HUA in C57BL/6JNifdc mice and investigated the potential of probiotics to regulate blood uric acid levels. Our results revealed significant differences in blood uric acid levels and renal impairment among the methods. Adenine causes severe renal injury, increases hepatic xanthine oxidase and purine nucleoside phosphorylase activity, and inhibits the expression of uric acid transporter proteins in the kidneys. In contrast, inosine, guanosine, and hypoxanthine mildly induce hyperuricemia in mice. We screened seven probiotic strains from fermented dairy products and evaluated their effects on uric acid metabolism both in vitro and in vivo. Notably, probiotics showed significant potential for degrading uric acid, modulating the expression of uric acid transporter proteins in the kidneys, and inhibiting renal inflammation. These findings provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of HUA and highlight the therapeutic potential of specific probiotics for managing this metabolic disorder. Our study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate animal models for HUA research and suggests that probiotics can be used as promising functional food additives to assist in hyperuricemia treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.