Evidence mapPaperPMID 40606286Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025

Regional and demographic variations in diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction mortality among US adults: A retrospective observational analysis from 1999 to 2023.

Ahlam Safdar Hussain, Sumantra Kumar De, Griff Chatwin, Maryam Shahzad, Eeshal Zulfiqar, Vaisnavy Govindasamy, Megha Goel, Muhammad Muneeb Arshad, Mohib Naseer, Syed Rizwan Bokhari and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Depression, health anxiety, and five-year mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the SEMI-CI cohort.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ahlam Safdar HussainFatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sumantra Kumar DeNorthwick Park Hospital, London, UK.
Griff ChatwinUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Maryam ShahzadDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Eeshal ZulfiqarDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Vaisnavy GovindasamyJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Megha GoelJames Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Muhammad Muneeb ArshadUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Mohib NaseerJames Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Syed Rizwan BokhariUniversity of Rochester, NY, USA.
Muhammad Atif RaufDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology AFIC & NIHD, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Sundas HasanUniversity Hospitals Leicester, UK.
Mushood AhmedRawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Raheel AhmedRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at an increased risk of having myocardial infarction (MI). We aim to identify the trends in the mortality rates from DM and MI among US adults stratified by demographic and geographical parameters. Methods: The CDC-WONDER database was used to extract death certificate data for adults aged ≥25 years. Crude mortality rates (CMR) and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons were calculated, and temporal trends were identified by calculating annual percent change (APC) using JoinPoint regression analysis. Results: From 1999 to 2023, a total of 712,921 DM and MI-related deaths were reported among adults in the United States. The AAMR significantly declined from 18.99 in 1999 to 10.20 in 2018 Following this, the AAMR rose to 12.27 in 2021, with an APC of 7.2 (95 % CI: 4.7 to 8.9). This was followed by a decline in AAMR to the pre-pandemic levels (AAMR: 9.6 in 2023). The AAMR for males was considerably higher compared to women throughout the study period (16.5 vs. 10.2). Non-Hispanic Black or African American people had the highest AAMR (19.5), followed by Hispanic or Latino people (15.3), NH white people (12.5), and NH other populations (11.2). Southern region and rural areas experienced higher mortality rates compared to urban areas. Conclusion: We observed decreasing trends in DM and myocardial infarction-related deaths throughout the study period, however, a surge was noted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mortality is higher among men, NH black populations, and rural areas.

Indexed as

CDC WONDERDiabetes mellitusMyocardial infarctionUSA

Identifiers

PMID40606286
PMCPMC12221463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.