ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Fusing residual dense and attention in generative adversarial networks for super-resolution of medical images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthetic CT generation from cone-beam CT using deep learning for head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The resolution of clinical medical images may be reduced due to differences in the radiation dose, sampling equipment, and storage methods. Low-resolution (LR) medical images blur lesion feature information and affect the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians. To address this issue, we proposed the fusing residual dense and attention in generative adversarial network (FRDAGAN) for the super-resolution (SR) of medical images. Methods: The FRDAGAN method is based on the generative adversarial network (GAN). First, the feature information of different layers is fully utilized by residual dense blocks to prevent gradient decay. Second, the attention gate (AG) network is used to suppress the noise information and improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, a hybrid loss function is used to prevent vanishing or exploding gradients in the network. Results: On the Luna16 dataset, using single images, the quantitative SR results, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and mean structural similarity index measure (SSIM) were 31.257/0.964, 33.558/0.968, and 34.201/0.882, respectively. While on the brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dataset, those values were 34.220/0.874, 35.735/0.885, and 35.854/0.908, respectively. The proposed method showed obvious enhancement compared to the other methods on the Luna16 and brain MRI test data sets, and the PSNR and SSIM values reached 33.005±0.157, 0.938±0.028, and 35.270±0.183, and 0.889±0.024, respectively. The uniform resource locator (URL) for Luna16 is https://luna16.grand-challenge.org/Download/, and the URL for brain MRI is https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mateuszbuda/lgg-mri-segmentation. Conclusions: The FRDAGAN method had better results in terms of the PSNR and SSIM than the other traditional methods, and was more stable in terms of the faster convergence of the loss function. The results showed that the FRDAGAN method is effective and advanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.