ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Can diffusion-based generated magnetic resonance images predict glioma methylation accurately?
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reconstructing accelerated magnetic resonance images across various modalities, particularly those involving pathological features such as brain tumors, represents a challenging yet crucial task for medical diagnostics. While deep learning approaches have improved reconstruction quality, existing methods often struggle with preserving diagnostic features across different contrasts. The development of methods that maintain pathological details while substantially reducing scan time remains a clinical need. The purpose of this study is to develop a generative model capable of reconstructing high-quality sequences from accelerated T1-weighted scans, while preserving pathological features critical for glioma diagnosis and MGMT prediction. Methods: In this retrospective study using the BraTS 2021 dataset (n=1,480), we present a diffusion-based generative model capable of producing enhanced magnetic resonance images from T1-weighted scans for T1 contrast-enhanced (T1CE), T2, and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. Our model was trained on 785 scans and validated on 695 scans with MGMT using 5-fold cross-validation. Simulating K-space degradation, our model recreates the effects of quicker scans at 4-fold and 32-fold acceleration. Results: For 4-fold acceleration, quantitative assessment showed high fidelity reconstruction across sequences [T1CE: structural similarity (SSIM) =0.972, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) =37.43; T2: SSIM =0.963, PSNR =33.44; FLAIR: SSIM =0.963, PSNR =34.16]. Two radiologists' visual assessments showed no significant differences between reconstructed and original images (P>0.05). The synthesized images also demonstrated consistent methylation classification, showing strong agreement for T1CE: concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) =0.966, R2=0.938; T2: CCC =0.945, R2=0.893; FLAIR: CCC =0.963, R2=0.928. Area under curve values for MGMT prediction remained stable across original and reconstructed images (FLAIR: 0.606, 0.603, 0.601 for original, 4-fold, and 32-fold acceleration, respectively). Conclusions: Our diffusion-based model demonstrates promise in accelerating magnetic resonance image acquisition while preserving vital pathological detail, suggesting enhanced diagnostic capabilities. Future research will evaluate its clinical application, aiming to enhance procedural efficiency and patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.