ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Data simulation to optimize frameworks for genome-wide association studies in diverse populations.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic variants in GRIN2B and NTRK2 on the etiology and treatment response to valproate and lithium in patients with bipolar disorder.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole-genome or genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have become a fundamental part of modern genetic studies and methods for dissecting the genetic architecture of common traits based on common polymorphisms in random populations. It is hoped that there would be many potential uses of these identified variants, including a better understanding of the pathogenesis of traits, disease risk prediction, discovery of biomarkers, and clinical prediction of drug treatments for populations and global health. Questions have been raised about whether associations that are largely discovered in European ancestry populations are replicable in diverse populations, can inform medical decision-making globally, and how efficiently current GWAS tools perform in populations of high genetic diversity, multi-wave genetic admixture, and low linkage disequilibrium, such as African populations. Here, we discuss some of the challenges in association mapping and leverage genomic data simulation to mimic structured African, European, and multi-way admixed populations to evaluate the replicability of association signals from current state-of-the-art GWAS tools. We use the results to discuss optimized frameworks for the analysis of GWAS data in diverse populations. Finally, we outline the implications, challenges, and opportunities these studies present for populations of non-European descent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.