SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
The convergent neuroscience of Christian prayer and attachment relationships in the context of mental health: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Neuroscience of Religious and Spiritual Practices: A Systematic Review of Neurotheological Evidence.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It has become increasingly accepted within psychotherapy to incorporate various forms of spirituality and religiosity to address the rising prevalence of mental health issues. This is well-founded, as a growing number of findings report benefits of spiritual practices for individuals experiencing depression, anxiety, and stress. However, science-based guidelines on how to embed spiritual practices in therapeutic interventions have not been developed, as the mechanisms by which human cognition, spirituality, and mental health interact-positively or negatively-remain largely unknown. Considering one of the most widely practiced religious behaviors worldwide, prayer, it is posited that the experience of interacting with God is psychologically comparable to human attachment bonds that are strongly associated with mental health. Method: This systematic review assesses the attachment to God hypothesis by providing an overview of the neural regions implicated in Christian prayer and attachment relationships, exploring their potential convergence. A systematic search was conducted in eight databases, resulting in 44 included records that examine brain activity during prayer or the activation of the attachment system in adults. Results: Evidence was found for convergence between prayer and neural correlates associated with the mentalizing module of attachment, comprising the default mode network (DMN) and areas associated with theory of mind (ToM), both related to social cognition. No significant differences were observed between prayer and attachment in regions connected to the approach and emotion (self-)regulation modules of attachment, whereas findings diverged for the aversion module of attachment, particularly in the insula. Discussion: The findings highlight shared cognitive and affective dimensions of attachment and prayer. Future research is warranted to identify whether neural patterns observed in different attachment styles coincide with distinct neural patterns of (Christian) prayer, so that both positive and negative effects of prayer can be better understood and integrated into psychotherapy. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HYZPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.