ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Stigma experience and coping strategies in stroke survivors: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A network analysis of physical resilience and social alienation among older adults with ischemic stroke.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Self-stigma and depression among community-dwelling adults with physical disabilities in China: the chain mediating role of social participation and self-esteem.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Perceived importance of walking among hospitalized patients with stroke: a thematic analysis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- The Effect of Guided Imagery and Music withIranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the true experiences of stigma and changes in stroke survivors and explore how they manage their symptoms. Background: Stroke is a serious disease that threatens human health with increasing mortality and disability rates. Declining self-care ability and excessive external dependence can easily lead to stigma. However, there is a lack of studies on real stigma experiences and coping styles among stroke survivors. Design: A descriptive qualitative study. Methods: Fourteen participants were recruited across inpatient stroke settings in China. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with participants to collect data. Audio-recorded data were transcribed. The data were analyzed using the seven-step Colaizzi method for phenomenological analysis, adhering to the principles of Phenomenological research methodology. The study adheres to SRQR EQUATOR checklist. Findings: Fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, revealing three main themes and ten sub-themes: (1) Non-adaptive emotion regulation in response to stigma, including sub-themes of remorse, shame, sadness, perceived disaster, depression, and reduced self-worth; (2) Adaptive emotion regulation in response to stigma, including positive reappraisal, positive adjustment, acceptance, and support systems; (3) Origins of stigma, including sources such as relatives, friends, oneself, and medical staff. Conclusion: The findings have the potential to inform the development and implementation of strategies to reduce the experience of stigma in early-stage clinical settings. Medical professionals must prioritize the comprehensive examination of genuine instances of stigma encountered by stroke survivors. Timely identification of stigma is imperative to mitigate the risk of patients adopting inaccurate beliefs and maladaptive coping mechanisms post-stroke. Strategies aimed at diminishing stigma should consider personal, familial, policy-related, societal, institutional, and environmental dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.