ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Association between relative fat mass and osteoarthritis in American adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relative fat mass predicts symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in older adults with metabolic syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Association between low-density lipoprotein and structural changes in the knee joint of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis is mediated by relative fat mass.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Association Between Relative Fat Mass and Parkinson's Disease in American Adults: A Large Cross-Sectional Study From NHANES.Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Relative fat mass (RFM) is a newly established anthropometric measurement that offers an alternative method for assessing body fat. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread public health issue, with existing evidence identifying obesity as a notable risk factor for the OA development. This study aimed to examine the potential correlation between RFM and OA within a nationally representative population. Methods: This study employed data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2018. Weighted logistic regression models were performed to assess the relationship between RFM and OA. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of various adiposity indicators for OA was examined through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, allowing for comparisons of area under the curve (AUC) values. Results: The study cohort comprised 28,535 participants from the NHANES dataset. The analytical results indicated significant positive associations between RFM and OA. Stratified analyses revealed notable effect modifications based on age and diabetes status concerning the RFM-OA relationship. Comparative ROC analysis indicated RFM exhibited a superior capability for predicting OA prediction (AUC values: 0.646) compared with traditional obesity metrics. Conclusion: The findings demonstrated a significant positive correlation between RFM and OA, indicating that higher RFM levels are associated with increased risk of OA. ROC analyses reinforced the diagnostic value of RFM for OA, with its predictive performance exceeding that of conventional adiposity metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.