Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607112›Full record

ReviewNPJ artificial intelligence2025

Large language models for disease diagnosis: a scoping review.

Shuang Zhou, Zidu Xu, Mian Zhang, Chunpu Xu, Yawen Guo, Zaifu Zhan, Yi Fang, Sirui Ding, Jiashuo Wang, Kaishuai Xu and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Spine patient history-taking: a two phase study of a prompt-engineered large language model assistant.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Shuang Zhou *Division of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Zidu Xu *School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Mian Zhang *Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX USA.
Chunpu Xu *Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Yawen GuoDepartment of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA USA.
Zaifu ZhanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Yi FangDepartment of Computer Science, New York University (Shanghai), Shanghai, China.
Sirui DingBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Jiashuo WangDepartment of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Kaishuai XuDepartment of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Liqiao XiaDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Jeremy YeungDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Daochen ZhaIndependent Researcher, San Francisco, CA USA.
Dongming CaiDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Genevieve B MeltonInstitute for Health Informatics and Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Mingquan LinDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Rui ZhangDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.

Funding

Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic disease diagnosis has become increasingly valuable in clinical practice. The advent of large language models (LLMs) has catalyzed a paradigm shift in artificial intelligence, with growing evidence supporting the efficacy of LLMs in diagnostic tasks. Despite the increasing attention in this field, a holistic view is still lacking. Many critical aspects remain unclear, such as the diseases and clinical data to which LLMs have been applied, the LLM techniques employed, and the evaluation methods used. In this article, we perform a comprehensive review of LLM-based methods for disease diagnosis. Our review examines the existing literature across various dimensions, including disease types and associated clinical specialties, clinical data, LLM techniques, and evaluation methods. Additionally, we offer recommendations for applying and evaluating LLMs for diagnostic tasks. Furthermore, we assess the limitations of current research and discuss future directions. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review for LLM-based disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

Computational modelsComputer science

Identifiers

PMID40607112
PMCPMC12216946

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.