ArticleDiabetology international2025
Longitudinal monitoring of urinary C-peptide levels following discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan in a type 2 diabetes patient: a case report and literature review.
Article in Diabetology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on urinary C-peptide excretion and endogenous insulin secretory capacity in a patient with type 2 diabetes: a case report.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report two cases of diabetes mellitus treated with sacubitril/valsartan, whose urinary C-peptide dynamics exhibited significant difference. The first case is an 84-year-old Japanese man with type 2 diabetes and hypertension who exhibited significantly elevated urinary C-peptide levels during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi). Despite normal serum C-peptide levels, his urinary C-peptide excretion was disproportionately high, suggesting that sacubitril/valsartan may have altered C-peptide clearance through neprilysin inhibition. The discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated gradual decline of urinary C-peptide levels, although they remained elevated compared to serum ones. Daily longitudinal monitoring of urinary C-peptide revealed marked fluctuations of its levels, indicating a prolonged and potentially complex effect of neprilysin inhibition on C-peptide excretion. Additionally, we observed a corresponding decrease in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) levels after discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan, further supporting the role of neprilysin inhibition in altering peptide metabolism. In contrast, the second case involves a 78-year-old Japanese woman with insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes and undetectable serum C-peptide levels. In her case, urinary C-peptide levels remained undetectable despite ARNi therapy. These cases highlight the need for careful clinical interpretation of urinary C-peptide levels in patients receiving neprilysin inhibitors. When evaluating pancreatic β-cell function using urinary C-peptide levels under ARNi therapy, it is crucial to consider extended monitoring of urinary C-peptide levels, the duration of drug withdrawal, and serum C-peptide levels to ensure accurate assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.