ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025
Hydrogels for preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection stenosis in early esophageal cancer: a comprehensive literature review.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrogel adhesives for upper gastrointestinal wound healing.Theranostics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as a cornerstone therapy for early-stage esophageal cancer due to its minimally invasive characterization and high efficacy. However, postoperative esophageal stricture remains a critical complication, particularly in cases involving circumferential mucosal defects, with reported incidence rates exceeding 80%. Conventional preventive strategies, including local or systemic steroid administration, esophageal stent placement, and repeated balloon dilation, are limited by side-effect concerns, procedural complexity, and suboptimal long-term outcomes. Recent advancements in regenerative medicine have highlighted hydrogels as innovative tissue-shielding materials with significant potential to mitigate post-ESD stenosis. These hydrophilic polymer networks exhibit unique advantages such as biocompatibility, tunable mechanical properties, and the ability to transfer therapeutic agents directly to the wound. This review synthesizes current evidence on synthetic and natural hydrogels, emphasizing their mechanisms in promoting epithelial regeneration, reducing fibrosis, and synergizing with current therapies (e.g., steroid-loaded formulations or stent placement). Key findings suggest that hydrogel-based interventions significantly lower stricture rates and minimize the need for invasive procedures, offering a promising paradigm shift in postoperative management. By bridging material science and clinical practice, this work underscores the transformative potential of hydrogels in enhancing patient quality of life following esophageal ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.