ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Intratumoral immunotherapy prior to cancer surgery, a promising therapeutic approach.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guided immunotherapy for residual solid tumor: integrating platelets and CAR T cells to reduce post-surgical recurrence.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Targeting the remodeled peritoneal ecosystem: a paradigm shift from tumor cells to the microenvironment in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has made astonishing progress in the last 10-15 years, and the rate of progress is accelerating. However, only 20 to 40% of patients benefit from this therapy with most immunotherapy applied post discovery of metastatic disease when therapeutic impact is more difficult to achieve. The first line of treatment for many patients following diagnosis is surgery. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, i.e. administration of immune therapy prior to surgery, has the potential to improve overall survival rates. Many patients without detectable metastases are diagnosed with a high risk of future metastasis and could benefit from effective neoadjuvant immunotherapy. An ideal neoadjuvant immune therapy will stimulate immune response against the identified tumor as well as undetected metastasis and be safe with minimal adverse events. In addition, the antitumor immune response it generates should not be blocked by subsequent surgery and should not delay the normal timeline of surgery. Finally, it should be relatively inexpensive. These features describe intratumoral immunotherapy (ITIT), a therapeutic approach that directly administers immune stimulatory agents or treatments into the tumor. By delivering the therapy directly into the tumor, it enhances local drug concentration while minimizing nonspecific immune activation and adverse events associated with systemic immunotherapy. ITIT can generate effective local immune response against tumor antigens, which expands the pool of tumor-recognizing effector T cells. ITIT induces and activates tumor specific T cell within days after the treatment, so surgery is not delayed. Tumor-recognizing effector T cells generated locally attack cancer both locally and systemically, targeting metastasis through the "abscopal effect". Neoadjuvant ITIT options are extensive and expanding and need research into optimal options to combine and associated dosing and timing. With the needed effort, neoadjuvant ITIT will develop into a safe, rapid and effective addition to current cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.