ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
The evaluation of performance for agroecological greenhouse tomato strategies by the CRITIC-OWA model.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Modern agriculture must begin to use production strategies that are increasingly sustainable. To help in decision-making, the present work analyzes the sustainability of greenhouse tomato production with different agroecological strategies: shading (conventional fixed mesh and mobile photovoltaic shading), grafting and deficit irrigation, based on economic, social, and environmental criteria. Methods: For the ranking of the different strategies, the use of an extension of the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) is proposed, in which the correlation between the criteria is obtained through the Pearson-OWA, where the aggregation of the quadratic differences between criteria is carried out considering the attitudinal character of the decision-maker, that is, using Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA), in addition to induced variables, with the Induced Probabilistic OWA CRITIC (IPOWA CRITIC). Three extensions are considered based on this model depending on the way the multicriteria score is calculated: i) the ranking is carried out on the relative score (S) of each alternative (IPOWA-S-CRITIC), ii) on the weighting vector (W) (IPOWA-W-CRITIC), or iii) on both (IPOWA-S-W-CRITIC). Results: The results of the classifications conducted indicate that the use of mobile photovoltaic mesh is a sustainable production strategy, due to its effect on production and quality of the crop, CO2 fixation, and irrigation water savings. Discussion: The use of mobile photovoltaic shades is compatible with tomato cultivation in a greenhouse if the management of the installation is performed considering the needs of the plants in most of the rankings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.