Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608103›Full record

ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2025

Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Clival Chordomas.

Mariam Al-Mutawa, Jörg Baldauf, Jan-Uwe Müller, Henry W S Schroeder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariam Al-MutawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Jörg BaldaufDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Jan-Uwe MüllerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Henry W S SchroederDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoscopic endonasal approach is a major step forward in the treatment of clival chordomas. It has improved the resection rate and in the same time reduced the complications. Chordomas located in the upper and mid-clival regions are well-suited for a purely endoscopic endonasal resection. Although with angulated endoscopes and curved high-speed drills, lateral parts of the tumor can be resected, lower clival lesions often necessitating a combination of both endonasal and transcranial approaches. A major limitation is a caudal tumor extension beyond the dens axis. For more caudally located lesions, a transoral approach might be needed. Since chordomas of the lower clivus may destroy the condyles or the dens axis, a posterior stabilization is frequently required in a second step of the surgery. Even though a gross total resection has been achieved, chordoma has the tendency to recur. Therefore, the current standard of care is postoperative proton or carbon ion radiation. Chemotherapy is not effective in classic chordomas, but has its place in poorly differentiated tumor which mostly occur in children. Recently, molecular targeted therapies have given hope for effective medical treatment options in the future.

Indexed as

ChordomaCranial Fossa, PosteriorNeuroendoscopySkull Base NeoplasmsHumansChordomaClivusEndoscopic endonasal approachExtended endonasal approachNasoseptal flapProton beam radiation

Identifiers

PMID40608103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.