Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608164›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury and advanced therapeutic approaches.

Shikha Yadav, Sayali Mukherjee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shikha YadavAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226028, India.
Sayali MukherjeeAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226028, India. smukherjee@lko.amity.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injuries are severe and debilitating, potentially causing permanent neurological losses. Such devastating injuries are associated with limitations in the established treatments, thus demanding some innovative avenues. One among such highly promising approaches concerning tissue-engineered repair in spinal cord injuries (SCI) is the employment of an amalgamation of cells, growth factors, and scaffolds by considering their possible application for regeneration and repair in damaged tissues. This review article covers all the complex pathophysiology associated with SCI, including acute, subacute, intermediate, and chronic phases. Traditional treatments include medications, surgery, and rehabilitation while advanced tissue engineering approaches involve hydrogels as well as electro spun nanofibers as cell scaffolds. Stem cells applied in such therapies may be derived from dental pulp stem cells, stromal cells, oral mucosa stem cells and olfactory ensheathing cells. Regeneration of the damaged area is dictated by controlling factors like neurotrophic factors, cyclic AMP, chondroitin sulphate, inflammatory cytokines etc. 3D scaffolds are recommended over 2D scaffolds. A dynamic and more effective method is provided by 4D scaffolds which may alter the structure in response to inputs. While there have been groundbreaking developments with these approaches, significant challenges exist in the translation of these laboratory investigations into efficacious therapies in the clinical setting. Further studies are thus needed to optimize the sources of cells, scaffold design, and delivery methods to attain the highest possible outcomes. The review also focuses on extracellular vesicular therapies and targeted therapies hold more promise for effective recovery.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesTissue EngineeringAnimalsHumansNerve RegenerationStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationTissue ScaffoldsBiomaterialsRegenerationSpinal cord injuryStem cellsTissue engineering

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.