SynthesisPloS one2025
The effectiveness of physical activity in asthma management: An overview of systematic reviews.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early childhood asthma and adiposity until adolescence: A prospective birth cohort study using body fat percentage.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Article
- Effect of physical activity on pulmonary function and quality of life in asthma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Creating home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programs for patients with asthma: insights from practice.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical activity (PA) has become a promising complementary non-pharmacological intervention to improve exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary fitness, and quality of life in individuals with asthma. This overview systematically consolidates existing evidence to assess the clinical viability of physical activity as a scalable supplementary therapy for asthma management.
methodsWe searched 12 electronic databases to identify systematic reviews (SRs) from inception until February 12, 2025, concerning the efficacy of physical activity in asthma management. Literature was independently reviewed, data extracted and verified by two researchers. A third author was designated to mediate any disputes concerning screening. The methodological quality of SRs was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess SRs 2 (AMSTAR 2) checklist, and the certainty of evidence for key outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
resultsThis study analyzed 34 SRs (published 2000-2024) that included quantitative synthesis involving 113-2280 participants from asthma populations: adults (9 SRs), children (8 SRs), and mixed adult-child cohorts (17 SRs), with disease severity varying from mild to severe. Ten SRs were assessed as moderate to high quality by AMSTAR 2, whereas the other SRs were classified as low or very low quality. We evaluated the quality of evidence for SRs utilizing the GRADE evidence quality assessment framework. Thirteen moderate-quality evidence, and 51 low or very low-quality evidence support the improvement of PA on the outcomes of asthma quality of life, asthma control, lung function, exercise capacity, and respiratory muscle strength.
conclusionEngagement in physical activity has been demonstrated to markedly enhance asthma-related outcomes. Specific interventions provide targeted advantages in various domains: aerobic exercise enhances AQLQ scores and lung function metrics, including FEV1, FVC, PEF; breathing exercises improve AQLQ, FVC, and PImax; yoga correlates with enhancements in AQLQ, FEV1, and FVC; aquatic exercise results in increased FEV1; and inspiratory muscle training yields improvements in FEV1, FVC, PEF, and PImax. Nonetheless, there exists an imperative requirement for more stringent studies to fortify the existing evidence base. Furthermore, due to the significant individual variability among asthma patients, the creation of personalized exercise prescriptions is expected to produce enhanced clinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.