ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Computational strategic recruitment for representation and coverage studied in the All of Us Research Program.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large scale data repositories like the All of Us Research Program are spurring new understanding of health and disease. All of Us aims to create a database of all Americans, addressing patterns of understudy of some groups in biomedical research. We study the representativeness (similarity to the U.S. population) and coverage (equality of proportion across U.S. Census demographic categories) of All of Us from 2017 to 2022, finding that All of Us recruited almost every understudied group at or above the group's Census proportion. Building on the program's successes, we propose a computational strategic recruitment method that optimizes multiple recruitment goals by allocating recruitment resources to sites and evaluate this method in recruitment simulation. We find that our methodology is indeed able to improve both cohort representativeness and coverage. Moreover, improvements in representativeness and coverage hold across numerous simulation conditions, supporting the promise of our recruitment techniques in real-world application.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.