ArticleCommunications biology2025
Visuoaffective day residue in hypnagogia involves sequential bihemispheric interactions between cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adolescent depression recognition and symptom prediction based on multi-view EEG network: an exploratory study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The intricate interplay between visual perception and emotion determines how waking experience influences mentation through a 'day residue' at once conspicuous yet hard to predict. Here we set out to map the neural sources associated with the visuo-affective processing of the 'day residue' during hypnagogic sleep. To this end, we assessed 28 healthy participants on a combined nap protocol with serial awakenings, pre-sleep stimulation with affective visual images, yoked measures of the semantic similarity between image and imagery reports, affect ratings, estimation of 64-channel EEG sources, and functional connectivity analysis. Overall, low-frequency EEG power was associated with weaker residues, and high-frequency EEG power was associated with stronger residues. The source networks most significantly correlated with imagetic and affective residues were markedly different across wake-sleep states, partially overlapping with the default mode network during N1 for up to 50% and 61%, respectively. The results allowed us to identify neural correlates of the visuo-affective processing of the day's residue, showing that the hypnagogic processing of the waking experience involves complex, dynamic and sequential bi-hemispheric interactions among multiple cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures with visual, limbic, optokinetic, and cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.