ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Diagnostic value of transcranial ultrasonography and clinical features for Parkinson's disease based on XGBoost model and SHAP visualization analysis: a retrospective study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics-based model for predicting neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer: Limitations and suggestions.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- An Explainable Approach to Parkinson's Diagnosis Using the Contrastive Explanation Method-CEM.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesParkinson's disease (PD) requires early diagnosis for optimal management. This study aims to evaluate whether combining transcranial ultrasonography (TCS) and clinical data using an interpretable machine learning model improves diagnostic accuracy. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, data from patients who underwent TCS between May 2023 and December 31, 2024, were retrospectively collected. Key clinical and TCS features were identified using the Boruta algorithm. An XGBoost model (an advanced gradient boosting algorithm) was developed based on these features, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP, a method for interpreting machine learning predictions) was applied to visualize their contributions to PD diagnosis.
resultsThe study included 599 patients (480 training, 119 validation) and achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.863 and 0.811 in training and validation datasets, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed that bilateral substantia nigra hyperechoic (SNHA) and the substantia nigra/midbrain ratio (S/M) were the most influential predictors.
conclusionIntegrating TCS with clinical data via XGBoost and SHAP provides high diagnostic performance and clear interpretability, supporting early PD diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Question Can TCS features combined with machine learning provide reliable diagnostic support for PD? Findings XGBoost model integrating TCS and clinical features achieved a high diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.811) and interpretable outputs via SHAP visualization analysis. Clinical relevance This interpretable AI model supports early PD diagnosis and individualized decision making using non-invasive imaging and routine clinical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40610840What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.