Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610946›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Comprehensive analysis of 385 chloroplast genomes unveils phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history in cassava.

Junru Qu, Haitian Fu, Ying Zhao, Xiaohua Dai, Liyan Lu, Ying Liu, Ganhui Mo, Feng Wen, Jun Li, Deepak Bhanot and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Junru Qu *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Haitian Fu *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Ying Zhao *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Xiaohua DaiGuangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Liyan LuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Ying LiuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Ganhui MoGuangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Feng WenGuangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Jun LiGuangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China.
Deepak BhanotCentre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140417, India.
Roma Sarnaik MorghadeAllied Health Sciences, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Jiten YadavDepartment of Chemistry, University Centre of Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Kaikai MengGuangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning, 530001, China. mengkaikai2024@163.com.

Funding

the Basic Scientific Research Fund of the Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2021YT149the Basic Scientific Research Project of the Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences GNK2024YP019the Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology Development Project GNK2023ZX06the Guangxi Scientific and Technological Development Subject AB21196071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a crucial staple food crop, yet our understanding of its chloroplast (cp.) genome has been limited due to the extensive diversity among cultivars. This lack of clarity has significantly impeded our comprehension of cp. genome evolution and genetic relationships within cassava germplasm.

resultsA total of 385 complete chloroplast (cp.) genomes of cassava cultivars were newly assembled. Comprehensive comparative analysis and phylogenetic trees were conducted. The cp. genomes varied in size from 160,702 to 161,564 bp, with GC content ranging from 35.87 to 35.97%. The cp. genomes exhibited a typical quadripartite structure, consisting of a large single-copy (LSC) region (88,633 − 89,406 bp), a small single-copy (SSC) region (18,132 − 18,255 bp), and two inverted repeat (IRa/IRb) regions (26,931 − 26,995 bp). Notably, the rps19 gene located in the IRa region was pseudogenic in all cultivars, while the ycf1 gene was pseudogenic in only three cultivars. Among the remaining 382 plastomes, 131 genes (111 unique) were encoded, including 85 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes. Phylogenetic analysis classified the 385 cultivars into four distinct clades, designated as Clade 1 to Clade 4. Additionally, 48 distinct haplotypes were grouped into four clusters that corresponded with the four clades. The cassava plastomes showed high overall similarity. Codon usage was nearly identical across plastomes. We identified three hypervariable regions, including rrn16S-trnI-GAU, ycf1, and rps4-trnF-GAA, that could distinctly separate the 385 accessions into four clades, aligning precisely with Clade 1 to Clade 4. A total of 31,045 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and 30,105 dispersed repeats were identified. Notably, the four distinct clades were also distinguishable based on SSR types, which could serve as potential molecular markers.

conclusionsOur study provided a thorough analysis of chloroplast genome features spanning a diverse array of cassava germplasm, significantly advancing our understanding of chloroplast genome evolution in this crucial crop. Phylogenetic relationships among 385 cassava cultivars were also elucidated. These profound insights are highly valuable for advancing genetic improvement strategies and guiding breeding endeavors aimed at enhancing cassava crops.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ChloroplastManihotPhylogenyGermplasm resourcesHaplotypeManihotPhylogenetic relationshipsPlastome

Identifiers

PMID40610946
PMCPMC12224629

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.