Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611025›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Construction and validation of a predictive model for the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries in the maxillofacial region in patients undergoing surgery in the prone position.

Wei Li, Jing Huang, Hua Li, Tingchun Gou, Ling Tang, Xuesu Dong, Chunmei Luo

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China.
Hua LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China.
Tingchun GouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China.
Ling TangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China.
Xuesu DongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. China.
Chunmei LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, 83 Xinqiao Main Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400037, P.R. China. luochunmei@tmmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct a model for predicting the risk of IAPI (Intraoperative acquired pressure injury) in the facial area of patients undergoing prone position surgery and to validate the predictive effectiveness of this model.

methodsWe analyzed data from 970 patients who underwent prone position surgery at a tertiary general hospital in Chongqing, China, from January 2022 to October 2022. Using univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis, we identified risk factors for IAPI in the maxillofacial region of patients undergoing prone position surgery and constructed a nomogram prediction model using R software. On the basis of the selected predictive factors, a risk prediction model was constructed and evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC). External validation was conducted to verify the model's performance.

resultsThe incidence of IAPI in prone surgery patients was 17.8%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that BMI, history of diabetes, surgical duration, muscle relaxant dosage, history of allergies, and preoperative Braden score were the most important factors for the occurrence of intraoperative pressure injuries in the facial region of patients who underwent prone position surgery (P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve of the prediction model is 0.863, the maximum Youden index is 0.681, the optimal cutoff value is 0.214, the sensitivity is 0.815, the specificity is 0.866, and the accuracy in actual application is 91.1%.

conclusionsThe IAPI risk prediction model for maxillofacial surgery patients in the prone position constructed in this study demonstrated good predictive performance, providing a basis for clinical medical staff to quickly identify high-risk patients and implement precise intervention plans before surgery.

Indexed as

Intraoperative ComplicationsPatient PositioningPressure UlcerAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsProne PositionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsYoung AdultMaxillofacialNomogramPrediction modelPressure ulcerProne position

Identifiers

PMID40611025
PMCPMC12226883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.