Observational studyBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Development and external validation of machine learning models for the early prediction of malnutrition in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Interpretability Analysis of a Stacking Ensemble Model for Early Prediction of Nutritional Risk in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- An Effective Model-Based Voting Classifier for Diabetes Mellitus Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- Enhancing sarcopenia screening in primary care: a machine learning approach using simple physical tests vs. SARC-F in 2,788 community-dwelling older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Translational Potential and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Adults in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- AI-Enabled Precision Nutrition in the ICU: A Narrative Review and Implementation Roadmap.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Article
- Interpretable machine learning-based predictive model for malnutrition in subacute post-stroke patients: an internal and external validation study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of malnutrition in critically ill patients is crucial for timely intervention and improved clinical outcomes. However, identifying individuals at risk remains challenging due to the complexity and variability of patient conditions. This study aimed to develop and externally validate machine learning models for predicting malnutrition within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, culminating in a web-based malnutrition prediction tool for clinical decision support.
methodsA total of 1006 critically ill adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) were included in the model development group, and 300 adult patients comprised the external validation group. The development data were partitioned into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Hyperparameters were optimized via 5-fold cross-validation on the training set, eliminating the need for a separate validation set while ensuring internal validation. External validation was performed on an independent group to assess generalizability. Predictors were selected using random forest recursive feature elimination; seven machine learning models-Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), random forest, decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), and logistic regression-were trained and evaluated for accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC), Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUC-PR). Model interpretability was analyzed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify feature contributions.
resultsIn the development phase, among 1006 patients, 34.0% had moderate malnutrition and 17.9% severe malnutrition. The XGBoost model achieved superior predictive accuracy with an accuracy of 0.90 (95% CI = 0.86-0.94), precision of 0.92 (95% CI = 0.88-0.95), recall of 0.92 (95% CI = 0.89-0.95), F1 score of 0.92 (95% CI = 0.89-0.95), AUC-ROC of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99), and AUC-PR of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95-0.99) on the testing set. External validation confirmed robust performance with an accuracy of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.79), precision of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.83), recall of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.79), F1 score of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.78), AUC-ROC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), and AUC-PR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.80).
conclusionsMachine learning models, particularly XGBoost, demonstrated promising performance in early malnutrition prediction in ICU settings. The resultant web-based tool offers valuable resource for clinical decision support.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200058286 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit? pid=248690 ). Registered 4th April 2022. Prospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.