ArticleClinical epigenetics2025
Exposing the DNA methylation-responsive compartment of the leukaemic genome in T-ALL cell lines support its potential as a novel therapeutic target in T-ALL.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Links Between DNA Methylation and Protein Translation and Their Impacts on Brain Development.Biology · 2026Review
- Triphenyl phosphate induces coordinated DNA methylation and gene expression changes in aquatic embryonic cells.Environmental epigenetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) exhibits exceptionally high levels of DNA methylation, with silencing of the DNA demethylating enzyme TET2 implicated in T-ALL's hypermethylation phenotype. We propose that DNA hypomethylating agents (HMAs) could be particularly potent in T-ALL cells with this phenotype. Here, we used a reversible DNMT1-specific inhibitor and the conventional HMAs, 5-azacytidine and decitabine, to assess the effects of global DNA methylation loss in T-ALL cell lines and the potential of using HMAs as targeted therapeutic agents in T-ALL. We demonstrate that removal of DNA methylation, even in the absence of DNA damage, results in cell death and that toxicity is negatively correlated with methylation levels. Notably, whereas DNA demethylation caused limited transcriptional changes, key tumour suppressor genes, including TET2, were upregulated in a methylation-dependent manner. Few endogenous retroviruses or immune-related genes were reactivated after demethylation, challenging the contribution of 'viral mimicry' to HMA toxicity. Together, these findings provide fundamental insights into the role of DNA methylation in T-ALL, demonstrating that the removal of DNA methylation alone is sufficient to (i) induce cell death in T-ALL cell lines and (ii) reactivate silenced tumour suppressor genes. Our findings support the development of therapies targeting the unique methylation phenotype of T-ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.