Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611936›Full record

ArticleExtended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2023

Near-Live Simulations to the Rescue: Lessons Learned from Using Alternative Simulation Approaches for Evaluating New Technologies.

Angela Mastrianni, Aleksandra Sarcevic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angela MastrianniDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Aleksandra SarcevicDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-8527

Funding

Intention-aware Recommender System for Improving Trauma Resuscitation OutcomesR01LM011834 · NLM · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BURD, RANDALL S., MARSIC, IVAN · 2014 to 2023
$4.7M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The near-live simulation method has advantages over other methods when testing technologies for supporting team-based work because testing can be conducted without requiring an entire team to assemble. In this case study, we describe our experiences in conducting 14 remote near-live simulation sessions to evaluate a digital checklist application used in pediatric trauma resuscitation. The remote near-live simulation sessions were complex to design and conduct because participants did not have direct access to a device that could run the checklist application and the digital checklist needed to integrate with the vital sign monitor used during resuscitations. We describe how we designed the environment for running the near-live simulations and discuss the lessons learned from conducting these simulations. We highlight three factors that need to be considered when using the near-live simulation approach: (1) filming or selecting the video of the simulated event, (2) providing participants with access to the system that is being evaluated, and (3) integrating the system being tested with other systems in the simulation scenario.

Indexed as

near-live simulationpediatric trauma resuscitationremote user testing

Identifiers

PMID40611936
PMCPMC12225656

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.