ReviewOncology research2025
Clinically proven natural products against breast cancer, with mechanistic insights.
Review in Oncology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute and Subacute Oral Toxicity Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Bioactive Natural Compounds in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Molecular Targets and Therapeutic Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Imperatorin: A Furanocoumarin with Potential in Combating Cancer Development and Progression-A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer still stands to be the foremost contributor to cancer-related incidence and mortality in women globally accounting for about 14% of all female cancer-related deaths worldwide. This research seeks to illustrate the mechanisms and clinical findings of natural products against breast cancer treatment. Methodology: Required data for this review article was retrieved employing several readily obtainable search databases, including Web of Science Results: Several natural products, namely Omega-3 fatty acids, dietary isothiocyanates, curcumin, green tea, flaxseed, limonene, and others, were found to modulate crucial pathways in breast cancer cells. These substances suppressed angiogenesis by downregulating the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), promoted apoptosis by activating caspase enzymes, and prevented cell proliferation by controlling cyclin-dependent kinases. Clinical studies demonstrated improved outcomes in patients receiving these natural products with standard treatment procedures. Discussion: The findings underscore the multifaceted functions of natural products in breast cancer therapy, highlighting their potential to increase the efficacy of conventional treatments while reducing adverse effects. Further exploration of synergistic actions and optimal dosages is needed. Conclusion: Clinically proven natural products represent a potential avenue for breast cancer treatment with their mechanistic insights that facilitate their incorporation into treatment regimens. To maximize clinical applications, future inquiries should center on elucidating the full spectrum of these anticancer functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.