ArticleCardiopulmonary physical therapy journal2025
Rehabilitation for Physical Frailty in Lung Transplant Candidates: A Systematic Review.
Article in Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frailty and prehabilitation in lung transplant candidates: A cross-sectional UK survey of assessment, provision and barriers.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Physical frailty is prevalent in lung transplant (LTx) candidates and is linked to adverse outcomes preoperatively and postoperatively. Exercise is beneficial in optimizing exercise capacity and quality of life in candidates, but its impact on physical frailty is unknown. Methods: We prospectively registered and published a protocol (PROSPERO CRD42022363730) before undertaking a systematic review. We searched 4 databases plus trial registries from 1980 to February 2024 for studies of exercise interventions in adults awaiting LTx. Outcomes were measures or surrogate markers of physical frailty. An NIH assessment tool was used to assess study quality, and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Fifteen studies (664 patients) were included. Interventions were in-person pulmonary rehabilitation, home exercise, and telerehabilitation. Studies included aerobic, resistance, balance, and breathing training. Only 2 studies assessed frailty using a phenotypic measure. Studies demonstrated improvement in some surrogate frailty outcomes including the Short Physical Performance Battery, 5 times sit-to-stand test, and handgrip or muscle strength measures. The study quality was fair or poor; evidence was low or very low certainty for all outcomes due to imprecision and high risk of bias. Uncontrolled study designs and heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes limit conclusions on effectiveness. Conclusions: Exercise training appears beneficial in modifying surrogate markers of physical frailty before LTx, but conclusions are limited by low or very low certainty evidence. High quality randomized trials are needed to determine the impact of exercise interventions on physical frailty and to develop guidelines for LTx prehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.