Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613005›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Regulatory challenges and global trade implications of genome editing in agriculture.

Danilo Fernández Ríos, Silverio Andrés Quintana, Pilar Gómez Paniagua, Andrea Alejandra Arrúa, Gustavo René Brozón, Moises Santiago Bertoni Hicar, Andrés Castro Alegría, María Florencia Goberna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Recent Advances inBiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  6. CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Its Applications in Cereal Crop Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Genome editing between wonder and rejection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Biodiversity and genetic improvement ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danilo Fernández RíosFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Silverio Andrés QuintanaFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Pilar Gómez PaniaguaFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Andrea Alejandra ArrúaFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Gustavo René BrozónCentro Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Tecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Moises Santiago Bertoni HicarUnión de Gremios de la Producción, Asunción, Paraguay.
Andrés Castro AlegríaDoctorado en Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad San Carlos, Asunción, Paraguay.
María Florencia GobernaCoordination of Innovation and Biotechnology, National Bioeconomy Directorate, Sub-secretariat of Agricultural Production and Forestry, Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing revolutionized agriculture by improving crop productivity, disease resistance, and adaptation to adverse climatic conditions. However, it has faced significant regulatory challenges due to divergent regulations between regions. Although Europe classified these organisms as genetically modified organisms, Africa, Asia, and Latin America implemented more flexible regulatory frameworks, which encouraged innovation and the participation of small companies. These differences could generate high costs, delays in commercialization, and difficulties in product traceability, affecting research and development decisions. This article analyzes the main regulatory challenges and their impact on global trade, proposing strategies for regulatory harmonization to promote transparency, reduce trade barriers, and maximize the potential of these technologies in the face of global challenges such as food security and climate change.

Indexed as

genome editingharmonizationinternational tradenew breeding techniquesregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID40613005
PMCPMC12222225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.