Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613076›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Enhancing heart disease prediction with stacked ensemble and MCDM-based ranking: an optimized RST-ML approach.

T Ashika, G Hannah Grace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T AshikaDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai, India.
G Hannah GraceDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global cause of death, necessitating the development of accurate diagnostic models. This study presents an Optimized Rough Set Theory-Machine Learning (RST-ML) framework that integrates Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for effective heart disease (HD) prediction. By utilizing RST for feature selection, the framework minimizes dimensionality while retaining essential information. Methods: The framework employs RST to select relevant features, followed by the integration of nine ML classifiers into five stacked ensemble models through correlation analysis to enhance predictive accuracy and reduce overfitting. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) ranks the models, with weights assigned using the Mean Rank Error Correction (MEREC) method. Hyperparameter tuning for the top model, Stack-4, was conducted using GridSearchCV, identifying XGBoost (XG) as the most effective classifier. To assess scalability and generalization, the framework was evaluated using additional datasets, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity levels, and breast cancer. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques were also applied to clarify feature importance and decision-making processes. Results: Stack-4 emerged as the highest-performing model, with XGBoost achieving the best predictive accuracy. The application of XAI techniques provided insights into the model's decision-making, highlighting key features influencing predictions. Discussion: The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the RST-ML framework in improving HD prediction accuracy. The successful application to diverse datasets indicates strong scalability and generalization potential, making the framework a robust and scalable solution for timely diagnosis across various health conditions.

Indexed as

correlation analysisgridsearchCVmachine learningmulti-criteria decision-makingrough set theorystacking classifier

Identifiers

PMID40613076
PMCPMC12222165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.