Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613229›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2025

Blood‑brain barrier dysfunction in epilepsy: Mechanisms, therapeutic strategies and future orientation (Review).

Na Huang, Yawen Huang, Zhenyuan Deng, Shuya Qi, Wei Zhang, Yuanyuan Liu, Guohe Tan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antiepileptic and antiepileptogenic effects ofIBRO neuroscience reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Na Huang *Institute of Neuroscience and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Department of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530016, P.R. China.
Yawen Huang *Institute of Neuroscience and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Department of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530016, P.R. China.
Zhenyuan Deng *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regenerative Medicine and Medical BioResource Development and Application Co‑constructed by the Province and Ministry, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530016, P.R. China.
Shuya QiInstitute of Neuroscience and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Department of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530016, P.R. China.
Wei ZhangInstitute of Neuroscience and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Department of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530016, P.R. China.
Yuanyuan LiuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regenerative Medicine and Medical BioResource Development and Application Co‑constructed by the Province and Ministry, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530016, P.R. China.
Guohe TanInstitute of Neuroscience and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain Science, Department of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530016, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood‑brain barrier (BBB) is a crucial structure for maintaining homeostasis within the central nervous system, and its integrity plays a pivotal role in the onset and progression of epilepsy. Epileptic seizures can disrupt the molecular architecture of the BBB, including the loss of tight junction proteins, activation of matrix metalloproteinases and dysfunction of supporting cells. Various pathological changes, such as transmembrane transport disorders, upregulation of platelet‑derived growth factor receptor β and vascular endothelial growth factor signalling pathways, and activation of astrocytes and microglia, accompany these alterations. These modifications exacerbate the entry of toxic molecules (such as albumin) into the brain parenchyma, triggering neuroinflammation and neuronal damage, thereby establishing a vicious cycle of epilepsy, BBB disruption and recurrent epilepsy. Consequently, repairing or protecting the BBB is a novel strategy for controlling epileptic seizures and treating drug‑resistant epilepsy. Consequently, compared with current treatment approaches that primarily focus on suppressing neuronal excitability, repairing or protecting the BBB is a novel strategy for controlling epileptic seizures and treating drug‑resistant epilepsy. Drugs such as botulinum, levetiracetam and angiotensin receptor blockers show the potential for BBB protection. The development of nanomaterials can enhance drug concentrations in affected areas, thereby offering new avenues for refractory epilepsy. The present study systematically reviews the critical role of the BBB in the pathogenesis of epilepsy, untangles the complex association between BBB dysfunction and the course of the disease, aims to deepen our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying BBB damage, and explores new approaches for epilepsy prevention and treatment from a BBB perspective. This review provides a theoretical foundation and research direction for the development of diagnostic and treatment strategies that are safer and more effective than current standard therapies.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierEpilepsyAnimalsAnticonvulsantsHumansAnticonvulsantsantiepileptic therapyblood‑brain barrierepilepsynano‑drug delivery systemneuroinflammationtight junction proteins

Identifiers

PMID40613229
PMCPMC12270381

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.